THANKFULLY THE ANGLOSPHERE DODGED THE ENLIGHTENMENT:

Afterthoughts on Constitutions (Carl Becker, March 1, 1938, Yale Review)

The failure of many constitutions did not abate the profound conviction that, with a little more enlightenment and insight, the right one, the true Palladium of Liberty, could be constructed. This conviction, since we can no longer share it, seems to us naïve; and we wonder what could have inspired so much optimistic faith in the power of the written word, such a childlike trust in the capacity of the human mind to create and guarantee rights and obligations by official definition.

Answers occur to us, of course. We think at once of the eighteenth century, the Age of Enlightenment, the age that pinned its faith to Natural Law, to the universal and imprescriptible Rights of Man, and to human reason as a sure instrument for discovering and interpreting those rights sub specie aeternitatis.

DESTROY THE RING:

The Council of Elrond (Robert Tracinski, 10/18/26, Symposium)

On the one side, there are those who want to keep the expansive, nearly unlimited executive power claimed by Donald Trump, so a future Democratic president can use that power to roll back Trump’s agenda and impose their own favored agenda. On the other side are those who want to restore limits on presidential power, who are urging Democrats to act vigorously to undo the damage created by Trump, but to do so within the limits of the Constitution and with the goal of restoring the Constitution.

You all know where I stand on this, but it is now a debate with a timeline. Democrats are likely to regain control of Congress in next month’s election, and if they do as well as they are projected to, they will be likely to win back the presidency in 2028. Within the next two years, we will all have to decide what we should do with the powers of Trump’s ultra-imperial presidency.

I can sum this up in one phrase, and anyone who knows the works of J.R.R. Tolkien already knows, from my main headline above, where I’m going with this.

We need the Council of Elrond.

Tragically, the temptation to wield the ill-gotten power will be seductive for Democrats, who favor most of Trumponomics.

SIC TRANSIT EMPATHY:

We Can Never Understand Elizabeth Holmes, or Nathan Fielder: Unlike Fielder’s past work, “You Can See Everything” isn’t very funny. Instead, the documentary, co-directed by Lance Oppenheim, is a haunting exploration of the limits of other people’s knowability. (Naomi Fry, October 17, 2026, The New Yorker)

Unlike his past work, however, “You Can See Everything” isn’t very funny at all. Instead, it’s a haunting exploration of the limits of other people’s knowability. How close can we really get to those around us? Where do we begin and where do they end? Are each of us, ultimately, all alone in the world, mere islands unto ourselves?

NO ONE WILL MISS LABOR:

Amazon Has Now Deployed Over 1 Million Robots, Which Is Bad News for Its 1.5 Million Workers: “Amazon likes to talk about its latest robots because it doesn’t want to talk about the tens of thousands of Amazon workers who are injured every year.” ( Joe Wilkins, Oct 17, 2026, Futurism)

That shifting terrain is great for Amazon’s bottom line. The robots help decrease friction across the company’s vast logistics empire, increasing speed and strengthening the company’s bottom line. And by allowing robots to “dictate the pace” of work, as Greenwood put it, Amazon is also loosening its need for human labor, disempowering workers both on an individual basis and in any potential collective bargaining arrangements.

Getting rid of all those injuries is humanist.

THE FUTURE ALWAYS HAPPENS FASTER THAN YOU EXPECT:

AI and 3D printing: When technologies collide, and something interesting happens (Paul Wallis, October 16, 2026, Digital Journal)

In a decade or so, 3D printing has gone from limited printing materials and comparatively simple designs to a virtual sector-wide DIY Renaissance.

3D printing has always needed and will need more contextual space for its ideas, more processing power, more and better materials, etc. This is where AI comes in. Processing and managing high data loads, vectors, and specifications are where the very high-grunt scientific form of AI excels.

These two almost new areas of science are growing up fast, and the future is looking limitless. 3D people, please excuse an unavoidable level of superficiality at this point, because there’s a lot to cover.

At the 3D production level, AI is already making itself very useful. It’s working in areas like managing large numbers of printers, predicting failures, design optimization, and practical things like additive manufacturing.

THE NEXT ORBAN?:

India’s Gen Z Gandhians Are Exposing the Brutal Side of Modi’s Hindu Nationalist Regime (Madhavan Narayanan, 10/16/26, UnPopulist)


Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is having a difficult year. He seemed to have consolidated unshakeable control over the world’s largest democracy through a combination of slogans designed to rile up the dominant Hindu majority against Muslims and other minorities, and allegations of corruption and tax evasion against opposition leaders. Even the slowing economy, high unemployment and inflation didn’t make any serious dent in his hold on power.

Over the last 10 days, however, he—and the country—has been jolted by a massive youth movement that is accusing his government of fixing elections through voter list manipulation; it is demanding accountability and insisting on its democratic rights.

Using a cocktail of nonviolent techniques reminiscent of Mahatma Gandhi’s Quit India movement against British colonialists, a Gen Z movement has gripped the country.

RISE THE TIDE:

We have to make people care about economic growth: The very real promise of economic growth must be made to seem tangible (Daniel Dieppe, 17 October, 2026, The Critic)

Indeed, properly understood, economic growth is a lynchpin to a whole myriad of social and economic problems. Paying the Triple Lock state pension, which rises by at least 2.5 per cent per annum, would be much easier if the economy kept pace with the single largest welfare expenditure. The NEETs and graduate jobs crisis could be solved if there were, well — more jobs. The arguments for mass immigration, supposedly needed to keep the economy going, could be pulled apart if economic growth remained high.

Yet despite growth’s almost puppeteer status at the centre of our modern national story, few people associate their everyday problems with it. Eliminating poverty, by far the greatest raison d’etre for left-wing politics, is not associated with economic growth, even though economic growth is the single greatest alleviator of poverty throughout history.

An economy exists to create wealth: its distribution is a political question.

IT DEMONSTRTES THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF EMPATHY:

The Elizabeth Holmes Documentary You Can See Everything Is an Act of Radical Empathy: The high-concept documentary from Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim offers surprising generosity to a Big Tech villain without fully excusing her crimes. (Peter Suderman | 10.16.2026, reason)

Just before she entered prison, Holmes invited documentarians Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim to live with her, her boyfriend Billy Evans, and their two young children in their beachfront San Diego rental unit, promising them full access, complete transparency. The result is this year’s most entrancing documentary, You Can See Everything. When the camera captures Billy in the shower, the movie delivers on its titular promise; you, uh, really can see everything.

Yet what you cannot see is who Holmes really is. The mystery of the era’s most famous fraudster is the movie’s central riddle: Is she cynical, calculating, a stone-cold liar and psychopath? Or is she something stranger—a damaged and delicate person who genuinely believes her lies, or at the very least, genuinely believes the stories she tells herself to justify those lies after the fact?

Fielder and Holmes seem uncertain themselves; the movie is, in part, their own attempt to wrestle with their own ambivalence, their own inability to come to a conclusion. It’s a hall of mirrors about the infinite unknowability of a person, even given unfettered access.

We can never truly know ourselves, nevermind another.

CAN’T WAIT TO HEAR HOW IT’S PERFECTLY NORMAL TO TRANSITION…:

The Kids Who Identify as Animals: A rising subculture of kids says they don’t feel entirely human. Here’s what their parents are learning to do with that. (Kara Baskin, 10/14/26, Boston Magazine)

What is new is where—and how young—the search happens. The furry world these kids move through lives largely online: The International Anthropomorphic Research Project (IARP), a group of scholars who study it, finds a heavy overlap with digital media use, and nearly 60 percent of furries say they found the fandom before turning 18. It’s a place where identity is constantly performed, debated, and policed, often by other kids. Yet even for the most online generation in history, some things arrive before the algorithm. The Internet gave Sol the word for it, and others who understood. But the feeling was already there.

The fandom also overlaps heavily with other marginalized groups, including LGBTQ+ and nonbinary young people—which has made it a target of moral panic. In 2022, the baseless claim that schools were installing litter boxes for students who identified as cats ricocheted across the Internet and into political speeches, sparking a new battle in the culture wars.

Furries are also routinely conflated with sexual fetish—adult furry content exists online—though that bears little resemblance to the kids sewing tails, painting masks, and trading art at PortCon. “One of the biggest misconceptions is that there’s sort of an adult undertone when really, this is about expression, identity, and creativity,” Werkhoven says. “There’s the conception that furry is strictly like a kink, and that’s not true. It’s: ‘I have a character, and that character is a dog.’”

That fear-and-fascination cycle is where most parents come in. Catherine, a Newton mother of two furry kids (now 27 and 21), found out her older child was a furry only because her younger one let it slip years ago; the older one feared the stigma too much to say so. “These furries are all anonymous. They’re in big fur suits, right? It could be anybody. I don’t know, factually, if this has ever happened, but there is fear that pedophiles will take advantage of younger kids,” she says. Then she chaperoned her younger child to a convention and found it closer to an art fair than a den of iniquity: kids and caregivers, mental health workshops, and costumes of startling craft. “They come up with a whole character. They have very elaborate stories of their character and terminology. It doesn’t matter if you’re a boy or girl, gay or straight; they become this other person, and they can open up,” she says. “I was impressed.”

Catherine’s reassurance, though, rests on something therian parents don’t have. Her children invented their “fursonas.” Sol didn’t invent the cat. The question in Susanne’s house isn’t whether this is safe—it’s what it means that her daughter isn’t pretending.